Broken Link Checker scans WordPress content for broken links, redirects, and missing images, with centralized fixing and alerts.
Table of contents
- TL;DR
- Broken Link Checker alternatives at a glance
- Why consider an alternative to Broken Link Checker?
- Broken Link Checker by AIOSEO for quota-based cloud scans
- Link Whisper when broken links are part of internal SEO
- SEOPress when broken-link auditing belongs inside the SEO suite
- Rank Math SEO when the real need is 404 request monitoring
- Which link-checking workflow fits your site?
- What to check before switching from Broken Link Checker
- When staying with Broken Link Checker makes sense
- Frequently Asked Questions
Broken Link Checker from WPMU DEV scans WordPress content for dead internal and external links, missing images, and redirected URLs. It can work through a local engine or a cloud-based checker, then gives administrators a central place to review and fix the results. That is a focused maintenance workflow, but different sites may prefer a cloud quota model, an internal-linking platform, or a broader SEO suite.
The alternatives below are not identical products. Two are direct broken-link scanners, one combines broken-link reporting with internal-link optimization, and one places link auditing inside a full SEO suite. Rank Math is included as an adjacent option only for teams whose real requirement is finding requested 404 URLs rather than crawling links embedded in content.
TL;DR
Broken Link Checker by AIOSEO moves link checking to AIOSEO’s cloud service and uses monthly link quotas. Link Whisper combines broken-link reporting with internal-link suggestions, orphan-content analysis, and link-structure reports. SEOPress places broken-link auditing, redirects, and 404 monitoring inside a paid SEO suite. Rank Math SEO does not replace a full broken-link crawler, but its 404 monitor is relevant when the main goal is identifying missing URLs that visitors or bots actually request. WPMU DEV’s Broken Link Checker still makes sense when you want a free dedicated checker with local and cloud scanning modes.
Pricing checked: September 26, 2026.
Broken Link Checker alternatives at a glance
Why consider an alternative to Broken Link Checker?
Broken Link Checker is free and can scan posts, pages, comments, custom fields, images, internal links, and external links. Its cloud engine runs checks on WPMU DEV infrastructure, while the local engine can operate from the WordPress site itself. The cloud workflow requires a Hub connection, but it does not require a paid WPMU DEV membership.
The main reasons to switch are about where the scan runs, what else you want from the link data, and how much vendor account dependency or server work you are comfortable with.
- You want a predictable cloud quota: AIOSEO makes link limits and paid tiers explicit.
- You want internal-link optimization as well as error detection: Link Whisper uses link reports for both maintenance and content structure.
- You want fewer SEO plugins: SEOPress can put broken-link auditing, redirects, 404 monitoring, schema, and other SEO tools under one license.
- You only care about requested 404 URLs: a 404 monitor can be lighter than crawling every internal and outbound destination.
- You have hosting-resource concerns: a cloud checker shifts more destination-checking work away from the WordPress server.
Broken Link Checker by AIOSEO for quota-based cloud scans
Broken Link Checker by AIOSEO is the closest direct alternative in this list. It indexes links from the WordPress site and performs destination checks through AIOSEO’s cloud infrastructure. That keeps repeated HTTP checks off the origin server.
The current plugin checks internal links, external links on paid plans, images, media URLs, and video links. Results can be filtered by status, and administrators can update or unlink a broken destination directly from the report. URL and domain exclusions help keep affiliate, tracking, or intentionally unreachable links out of the scan.
The free account currently includes up to 250 internal link checks per month. Starter is listed at $4.99 per month for one site and 1,000 links per month. Higher plans raise both site limits and monthly link allowances, with external-link checking included in paid tiers.
Compared with WPMU DEV’s plugin, the difference is a more explicit usage model. That can make cost predictable for small sites, but a large archive may burn through a quota quickly. An AIOSEO account is also required for the cloud service.
Link Whisper when broken links are part of internal SEO
Link Whisper approaches link maintenance from an internal-linking perspective. Its reports map inbound and outbound links, surface orphaned content, show linked domains, and help editors add relevant internal links. The Premium Error Report checks indexed links for broken or deleted destinations.
The documented checker runs in small recurring batches through WordPress Cron rather than testing the entire link set in one request. This reduces single-scan load and lets the report build over time. Recent versions have added progress reporting, search, retry behavior, redirect tracing, and false-positive handling.
Link Whisper Free is available on WordPress.org, but the vendor’s current feature list presents the expanded Error Report and deeper reporting features as Premium. The current one-site Premium license is $97 billed annually.
The trade-off is scope. You are buying an internal-linking platform, not only a broken-link checker. That makes sense when orphan pages, link suggestions, and internal architecture are part of the same SEO program. It is unnecessary if you only want a list of dead URLs.
SEOPress when broken-link auditing belongs inside the SEO suite
SEOPress is relevant when link maintenance is one part of a wider technical SEO workflow. SEOPress Pro includes site auditing, redirect management, 404 monitoring, schema, local SEO, WooCommerce SEO, analytics features, and broken-link-related auditing tools.
Current Pro pricing starts at $49 per year for one site, $59 per year for five sites, and $149 per year for unlimited sites. The free version provides the core SEO foundation, while the advanced audit and redirect features sit in Pro.
This can reduce plugin count for an agency already using SEOPress. Instead of maintaining one plugin for metadata and schema, another for redirects, and another for link checks, more of the technical SEO workflow can live in one product.
The trade-off is cost and coupling. Replacing a free dedicated checker with a paid SEO suite only makes sense if you value the wider SEO capabilities. Also verify the exact crawl scope you need, because a site audit and a dedicated continuously monitored link checker are not always operationally identical.
Rank Math SEO when the real need is 404 request monitoring
Rank Math SEO is the adjacent option in this comparison, not a direct crawler replacement. Its 404 monitor records requests for missing URLs that visitors or bots actually reach, and its redirect manager can then send important old URLs to a current destination.
That solves a different problem from crawling every link in your posts. A link crawler can find an outbound URL that now returns an error even if no visitor has clicked it recently. A 404 request log can discover an old backlink or bookmarked URL that no longer appears anywhere in your content. Some sites need both.
Rank Math has a free version, while current paid plans start at €7.99 per month billed annually. The product also covers schema, sitemaps, metadata, analytics, breadcrumbs, local SEO, and other search-management functions.
Consider this approach only when your actual maintenance goal is reactive 404 discovery and redirect management. It should not be treated as a one-for-one replacement for checking external links, broken images, or every content URL on a schedule.
Which link-checking workflow fits your site?
Start with the type of failure you are trying to find.
- If you want dedicated internal, external, image, and video checks with an off-server scanner and clear monthly quotas, AIOSEO changes the operating model without changing the basic task.
- If you also want to improve internal-link coverage and find orphaned content, Link Whisper makes the broken-link report part of a larger site-structure workflow.
- If link auditing should live beside redirects, schema, metadata, and other SEO administration, SEOPress can consolidate those jobs.
- If your main concern is old URLs that users or crawlers request and receive a 404, Rank Math’s request monitor addresses that narrower adjacent need.
What to check before switching from Broken Link Checker
Changing link checkers is less risky than changing a redirect engine, but you can still lose useful scan history, exclusions, and monitoring behavior if you switch without documenting the current setup.
- Export or record the current broken-link list, ignored URLs, excluded content types, and any links that were intentionally marked as valid.
- Decide whether internal, external, media, and redirected URLs all need recurring checks. Some products charge or behave differently for each category.
- Check where scans run. Local crawlers use your hosting resources, while cloud scanners introduce an external service and account dependency.
- Compare scan frequency. A monthly quota, scheduled local batch, on-demand crawl, and request-based 404 monitor are different maintenance models.
- Recheck a sample of reported failures manually. Firewalls, rate limits, bot protection, and temporary server errors can create false positives.
- Do not automatically redirect every broken outbound URL. Update, remove, or replace external links based on what the content actually needs.
When staying with Broken Link Checker makes sense
Staying with WPMU DEV’s Broken Link Checker is reasonable when you want a free dedicated scanner and like having both local and cloud modes available. The product is built specifically around finding broken and redirected URLs rather than bundling that task into a larger SEO platform.
It also makes sense when the existing reports, email notifications, inline fixes, and WPMU DEV Hub workflow already fit your maintenance process. Switching to a usage-limited cloud service or a paid internal-linking tool may add cost without solving a problem.
If server load was the original concern, test the current cloud engine before assuming an alternative is necessary. The cloud mode exists specifically to move the checking workload away from the local WordPress server.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a free alternative to Broken Link Checker?
Yes. Broken Link Checker by AIOSEO has a free monthly allowance for internal links, and Link Whisper has a free internal-linking plugin. Their broken-link limits and feature boundaries differ from WPMU DEV’s free checker.
Which alternative checks links in the cloud?
Broken Link Checker by AIOSEO runs destination checks through AIOSEO’s cloud service. WPMU DEV’s Broken Link Checker also offers its own cloud engine as well as a local mode.
Is a 404 monitor the same as a broken-link checker?
No. A 404 monitor records requests that reached a missing URL. A broken-link crawler checks URLs found in content, including external destinations that may never have been requested recently.
Can Link Whisper find broken links?
Yes. Its Premium Error Report checks links indexed in the Link Whisper reporting system and identifies broken or deleted destinations while also providing internal-link structure data.
Does SEOPress include broken-link tools?
SEOPress Pro includes technical SEO auditing alongside redirects and 404 monitoring. It is a broader paid SEO workflow rather than a standalone free checker.
Should I redirect every broken link I find?
No. Internal moved pages may need redirects, but dead external links are usually better updated, replaced, or removed. Redirect only when there is a meaningful destination for the old URL.