Build multilingual WordPress sites with content translation, string translation, translation workflows, WooCommerce support, and AI-assisted translation.
WPML vs Weglot is primarily an architecture decision. WPML makes WordPress itself the multilingual CMS; Weglot adds a hosted translation service around the rendered site. Both can produce indexable language versions, but they differ sharply in where translations live, how editors work, how costs scale and what happens when the subscription changes.
Decision snapshot
WPML manages multilingual content inside WordPress. Weglot automatically detects content, translates it through a hosted service and serves translated versions through its translation infrastructure. The biggest difference is ownership and operational model, not simply feature count.
WordPress-native multilingual CMS vs hosted translation layer
WPML is a WordPress-native multilingual suite. Editors translate posts, pages, taxonomies, strings and WooCommerce content through WordPress and WPML’s translation tools. Weglot works as a translation service layered onto the site: it detects content automatically, generates translations, provides a dashboard and visual editor, and serves language versions through dedicated URLs.
That difference affects maintenance. WPML gives you more direct control inside WordPress but requires more configuration. Weglot can make a site multilingual quickly, but the translated experience depends on the active Weglot service.
AI translation and review workflow
Both have strong automatic-translation workflows. WPML’s CMS and Agency plans include AI translation words and offer additional usage-based translation. Weglot automatically translates detected content, then lets you refine translations through its dashboard, glossary and visual editor.
Weglot’s hosted model also centralizes collaboration and professional translation ordering. WPML keeps translation management much closer to WordPress editorial workflows.
International SEO and WooCommerce behavior
WPML supports translated metadata, slugs, hreflang and multilingual WooCommerce through its CMS tier. Weglot includes multilingual SEO features such as dedicated language URLs, hreflang and server-side translated content. Higher Weglot plans add translated URLs and more advanced domain options.
Both can handle WooCommerce, but the implementation differs: WPML understands WordPress/WooCommerce data relationships directly, while Weglot translates the rendered site through its service. Complex stores should test checkout, account pages, product variations, email workflows and third-party extensions.
Cost model: sites and AI words vs translated inventory
WPML licenses are annual: €39 Blog, €99 CMS and €199 Agency, with 1, 3 and unlimited production sites. Automatic translation above included usage can add variable cost.
Weglot currently lists a €0 Free plan for very small projects: up to 2,000 translated words and one translated language. Starter is €15/month or €150/year for 10,000 words and one translated language. Larger plans scale by translated-word allowance, number of languages and projects. Weglot offers a 15-day refund window on an original premium purchase.
Cancellation, portability and search-risk planning
This is one of the most important differences. WPML translations live inside the WordPress multilingual setup. With Weglot, canceling or pausing the service makes translated content unavailable and translated pages are progressively removed from search engines.
Before moving from Weglot to WPML, export or otherwise preserve the translations you need and plan how they will map to WordPress content and strings. Before moving from WPML to Weglot, clean up old language URLs and redirects to avoid duplicate or orphaned translated pages.
Which operating model fits your site?
Consider WPML when you want the multilingual system controlled primarily inside WordPress, need complex content relationships, or run a WooCommerce/editorial workflow that benefits from formal translation jobs. Consider Weglot when fast deployment, automatic content detection and centralized cloud translation management outweigh the ongoing service dependency.
For large multilingual sites, estimate total translated word volume and target languages before choosing. Weglot’s subscription can scale materially with usage, while WPML’s license is site-based plus automatic-translation consumption.
Team access is another operational difference. Weglot lets collaborators work from its separate dashboard without broad WordPress privileges, which can be useful when external translators are involved. WPML keeps more of the process inside WordPress and can assign translation roles and jobs. Security and editorial teams should decide whether translators are expected to work inside the CMS or in a dedicated translation service.
Content ownership after cancellation deserves explicit planning. WPML licenses control updates, support and access to new versions, while existing WordPress translation data remains part of the site. Weglot is a live service: its own support documentation says translated content stops being served when the subscription is canceled or paused. That is a material difference for sites whose translated pages already earn search traffic.
FAQs
Does Weglot have a free plan?
Yes, for projects under 2,000 translated words with one translated language.
What happens if I cancel Weglot?
Weglot states that translated content will no longer be active and translated pages will progressively disappear from search engines.
Is WPML subscription-based by translated word count?
No. WPML licenses are site-based annual plans, while automatic translation beyond included usage has separate consumption pricing.